| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Symposium Chairperson | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chunhui Xu, Group Leader, Geron Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8:00 | Potential Applications of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes in Drug Discovery | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
In the recent years, several non-cardiovascular drugs have been withdrawn from the market because of unanticipated cardiotoxicity. These drugs are often associated with prolongation of the electrocardiographic QT interval, which could potentially induce fatal arrhythmias. Therefore, evaluation of cardiotoxicity has become one of the principal concerns for the pharmacological industry. Assessment of cardiotoxicity is traditionally carried out in models that use modified cells as surrogates for human cardiomyocytes due to limited supplies of the latter; human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) present a new resource for addressing this issue. hESCs offer considerable advantages over primary or immortalized cells owing to their extensive proliferation capacity and ability to differentiate into multiple cell types. hESCs are able to generate large amounts of cardiomyocytes with relevant physiological phenotypes. This may translate to more reproducible and accurate evaluations of targets in a more cost-effective manner. For application of hESC-derived cardiomyocytes in drug discovery, several critical procedures have to be worked out. These include stably expanding undifferentiated hESCs, generating cardiomyocytes in a highly efficient and enriched manner, and extensively characterizing these cells. In this talk, I will present progress we have made along this line focusing on optimization of growth and differentiation conditions for hESCs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chunhui Xu, Group Leader, Geron Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8:30 |
Small Molecule Inducers of Stem Cell Cardiogenesis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Mark Mercola, Burnham Institute for Medical Research | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9:00 |
The Use of Stem Cells in Drug Discovery |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Yael Weiss, M.D., Ph.D., Director, Worldwide Licensing & External Research, Merck & Co. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9:30 |
Networking Refreshment Break & Exhibit Viewing |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10:00 |
Single ES Cell Profiling Reveals Unique microRNA Expression Signatures and Heterogeneities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
We describe a new method for simultaneously quantifying 237 mouse microRNAs (miRNAs) and 21 messenger RNAs (mRNAs) from single embryonic stem (ES) and differentiated cells. The method is based on multiplex RT, multiplex preamplification, and singleplex real-time TaqMan® PCR assays. Assays are quantitative for a dynamic range of at least four logs. Single cell expression signatures could classify individual ES, embryoid body (EB), or somatic cells. Significant inter-cell variations of both miRNA and mRNA expression were observed within ES cell lines, indicating the heterogeneity of ES cells. Higher variability was observed among EB cells, demonstrating that EB cells undergo differentiation at different stages. Interestingly, ES marker gene Oct4 and signaling gene Tdgf1 were co-expressed. Both were absent in 3T3 and splenocyte cells, highly expressed in ES cells, and significantly reduced in EB cells. Furthermore, there was no correlation in the expression levels between miRNAs and their predicted target mRNAs, thereby supporting a translational repression model. The total number of expressed miRNA genes in ES, EB, and somatic cells remained constant. However, their expression levels were significantly elevated during differentiation, further suggesting the involvement of miRNAs in cellular development and specification. Our results provide new insight into both miRNA and mRNA expression patterns at the single cell level. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Caifu Chen, Director, Gene Expression & Genotyping Assays R&D, Applied Biosystems | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10:30 |
Targeting Adult Stem Cells for Cardiomyogenesis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Potential treatments
for cardiovascular disease may involve targeting stem cells for
cardiomyogenesis. The widespread application of cardiovascular stem cell
therapies will likely be based on pharmacological approaches to enhance
the capacity of endogenous cardiac stem cells. Optimally, these
treatments will be capable of promoting stem cell function in those with
the greatest medical needs, including elderly and diabetic individuals.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jay M. Edelberg, Bristol Myers Squibb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11:00 |
Using a Neurogenesis Based Platform to Develop Novel Therapeutics for Depression | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The discovery of
neurogenesis in the adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS) has led
to a dramatic shift in our understanding of brain plasticity and the
role it plays in mood disorders. Research in the field continues to
suggest the possibility of developing improved treatments for disorders
of the CNS based on pharmacological modulation of the process of
neurogenesis. Isolation and subsequent culturing of neural progenitor
cells in vitro has opened up the field to the study of underlying
molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in neural fate determination,
targets associated with these effects, and compounds that can influence
those targets. These exciting new approaches to human neural stem cell
biology are particularly important for drug discovery, providing
researchers with tools to explore the effects of compounds on neurogenesis and interpreting the relevance of preclinical rodent
studies in the context of human disease. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Todd Carter, Ph.D., Director of Biology, BrainCells, Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11:30 |
End of Symposium I | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Symposium Chairperson | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chang-Deng Hu, Assistant Professor, Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University School of Pharmacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8:00 |
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation – A Novel Imaging Technology for Visualization of Protein Interactions in Living Cells and Living Animals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Protein-protein interactions are key mechanisms implicated in almost all cellular processes. Given that small molecule inhibitors of protein interactions are valuable tools for dissecting signaling pathways and for therapeutic purposes, protein-protein interactions, in principle, are ideal molecular targets for drug discovery. However, targeting protein-protein interactions has been largely unexplored or avoided in pharmaceutical industry because of an unsuccessful history. One contributing factor to this is the lack of available technologies that can be used for the design of specific and cost-effective screening systems for identification of small molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions. We have used fluorescent proteins and developed a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay for visualization of protein interactions in living cells. Over the past few years, the BiFC and BiFC-based technologies have been successfully used for visualization and identification of protein interactions in living cells and living organisms. This presentation will introduce the basic principle of BiFC assay, new applications of BiFC-based technologies, potential applications of BiFC-based technologies for drug discovery, and a comparison of multicolor BiFC-based high throughput screening system with other protein interaction-based high throughput screening systems. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chang-Deng Hu, Assistant Professor, Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University School of Pharmacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8:30 |
Ultrasound-Based Molecular Imaging |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Klaus Ley, Head, Division of Inflammation Biology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy & Immunology Adjunct Professor of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9:00 |
Imaging in CNS Drug Development: Applications and Prospects for Process Improvement |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Richard Margolin, Director Early Clinical Research and Experimental Medicine, Schering Plough | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9:30 |
Networking Refreshment Break & Exhibit Viewing |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10:00 |
The Role of Small-Animal SPECT/CT in Pre-Clinical Drug Discovery |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
While possibly the
least-heralded molecular imaging modality, recent technical advances in
small-animal SPECT instrumentation offer picomolar sensitivity combined
with nanoliter resolution. This presentation focuses on the role of
small-animal SPECT in the molecular imaging through a discussion of
image system performance, SPECT imaging agents, direct and indirect
comparisons to other imaging modalities and results from multiple
pre-clinical case studies using the technology. We provide a detailed
discussion of specifications and advancements in areas of image
resolution, sensitivity, absolute quantification, multi-modality
registration, cardiac and respiratory gating. Of equal importance we
present a recently developed on-line SPECT radiopharmaceutical database
of imaging agents posted to expedite the dissemination of both
commercial and novel imaging agents amongst our user base. Ideally,
molecular imaging would consist of radio-labeling and imaging a compound
of interest in such a manner that adding the signaling molecule or
isotope would not affect the kinetics or dynamics of the unlabeled
compound. While in rare circumstances this is possible, we show multiple
examples of more practical applications in which SPECT allows a
quantifiable, longitudinal evaluation of the pharmacodynamics of an
intervention by assessing the changes in the pharmacokinetics of a
well-characterized radiopharmaceutical. Case studies and applications in
oncology, cardiology, neurology as well as multi-purpose imaging agents
are presented. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jack Hoppin, Bioscan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10:30 |
In Vivo Imaging of Microglial Activation in the Mouse Central Nervous System using Multiphoton Microscopy |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In recent years, in vivo imaging using multiphoton microscopy has revolutionized our understanding of the brain’s physiology and pathology. In this talk I will introduce the technological advances that made imaging of living cells in their unperturbed environment possible. I will mention representative in vivo imaging studies that have changed our perception of how the brain is hardwired and how it responds to environmental stimuli both physiologically and in animal models for disease. I will use our study of microglia in the living mouse brain as an example of how in vivo imaging can reveal not only structural but also mechanistic details that underlie the brain’s responses to traumatic injury. I will also discuss the technical challenges that have been restricting the application of in vivo imaging to the spinal cord of animals. Finally, I will present a novel technique that allows stable imaging of fluorescently labeled cells in the living mouse spinal cord that requires minimal surgery and essentially no image post-processing. This technique can be used to repetitively image axons, glia and the vasculature in the spinal cord of anesthetized mice, thereby allowing the application of multiphoton microscopy to study the spinal cord in physiology, injury and disease. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dimitrios Davalos, Ph.D., University of California, San Diego | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11:00 |
Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Perfusion |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Time-resolved magnetic resonance imaging has been used clinically for many applications such as contrast-enhanced MR angiography, perfusion in tumors and drug delivery. In this talk I will first introduce some background on MR imaging (including T1 and T2 relaxation times, image formation, contrast agent, etc) and dynamic imaging. In the second part I will discuss the fast dynamic imaging techniques developed in our group and their applications. Technical issues such as temporal and spatial resolution will be addressed. In the third part, I will discuss a novel technique called ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging, which can be used to image tissues with such short T2 relaxation times that they are typically undetectable with clinical magnetic resonance pulse sequences. This technique can be used to image the contrast dynamics in bone, meniscus, tendons, ligaments, etc. This allows perfusion quantification of a large group of short T2 tissues, which can be of great clinical potential for assessment of drug delivery in the musculoskeletal system (MSK). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jiang Du, Ph.D.,
Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, University of California, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11:30 |
End of Symposium II | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8:00 |
Quality By Design: Here's What's In It For You |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Currently pharmaceutical
firms are achieving drug products of reasonable quality at great cost
due to batch failure and regulatory delays. Quality by Design (QbD) is a
program described in ICH guidances and encouraged by the FDA. It is a
system of critical analysis and scientific rationale. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marilyn A. Apfel, Ph.D., xFDA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8:30 |
QbD: It Doesn’t Have To Turn Development Into Research - Examples From Early Development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quality by Design (QbD) is
promoted to reduce review time and increase lifecycle regulatory
flexibility, but is sometimes seen as an opportunity to turn development
into research and to stimulate unlimited review questions – an
especially unattractive alternative to the status quo at a time when
discovery-to-market timelines must be reduced. QbD is really just an
encouragement to integrate requirements, risk assessments, predictive
models, measurements, and data analysis to the extent that the tools
contribute to a better understanding of product performance. QbD’s real
value is as a carefully considered shift from “do the right thing” to
“know the right thing,” and QbD is completely consistent with improved
decision making and reduced timelines. There are many QbD tools that can
be used in early drug development and these will be discussed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steve Bannister, Ph.D., Xcelience | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9:00 |
How to Fail an FDA Inspection . . . and 10 Steps to Make Sure You Don’t! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Maybe worse – or as bad as
– a pop quiz in school is an unannounced inspection of your facility by
FDA. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James Wood, Esq., Partner, Reed Smith LLP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9:30 | Networking Refreshment Break & Exhibit Viewing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10:00 |
Special FDA Regulatory Disclosure Issues for Life Sciences Companies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sergio Garcia., Partner, Reed Smith LLP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10:30 |
Effective Communication with FDA |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Emil Samara, PharmaPolaris International Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11:30 |
End of Symposium III |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plenary Keynote Sessions | |||||||
| Wednesday, October 15, 2008 Back to the Top | |||||||
|
|
| ||||||
| 1:30 | R&D Productivity: Shooting at Moving Targets | ||||||
| David Nicholson, Ph.D., Senior Vice President, Global Project Management, Schering-Plough | |||||||
| 2:15 | Updates and Recent Initiatives at the United States Patent and Trademark Office | ||||||
Bruce Kisliuk, Assistant Deputy Commissioner, Biotechnology, United States Patent and Trademark office |
|||||||
| 3:00 | Networking Refreshment Break & Exhibit Viewing | ||||||
| 3:30 | The Cost and Benefit of Portfolio Innovation | ||||||
|
Over the last several decades we have seen an increase in life expectancy and significant progress in treating the most common causes of death in United States. A fair portion of this progress has been directly due to the development of innovative new medications from our industry. Now, however, as we design treatments for today’s leading illnesses, we bear not only the significant challenge of elucidating the scientific and clinical benefits of the new medications, but also of maintaining a higher awareness of the social and economic impact. Genentech and others in the biotech and pharmaceutical industry still seek to develop innovative medications. In this presentation we will (i) review historical drug development costs and its impact on society, (ii) assess the current environment for drug development - is innovation in the pharmaceutical industry threatened?, and (iii) consider trends we can impact to maintain a company’s focus on scientific progress and improved treatments for patients. |
|||||||
| Ashraf Hanna, M.D., Ph.D., Vice President, Alliance Management and Pipeline Planning Support, Genentech, Inc. | |||||||
|
|
| ||||||
| 4:15 | Announcement of Awards For Winning Posters | ||||||
|
4:30 |
Networking Reception, Poster Session & Exhibit Viewing |
||||||
| Thursday, October 16, 2008 - Plenary Session Continues | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
7:00 |
Registration & Breakfast |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| 8:00 | Small Pharma, Big Pharma and Small Drugs and Big Drugs: or a Middle Way for Mid-Pharma? | ||||||
|
During the
last two decades there has been a dramatic change in preclinical
research and drug discovery. Major scientific advancements have been
made in our molecular understanding of biology in health and disease. In
parallel there has been a revolution of the drug discovery techniques.
This has lead to a considerable increase in the number of therapeutic
targets as well as a major increase in the number of drug candidates.
Drug discovery has consequently entered into an era when very complex
and highly novel therapeutic approaches can be brought forward into
development. However, it is well known that overall productivity is
rather on the decline, with major issues in most development pipelines
of the industry today; high attrition, pipeline gaps, resource
constrains, escalating costs, increased regulatory hurdles, etc.
Although the reasons for this remain to be fully understood, a key
element is high attrition in early development phases. In particular,
target validation and the coupled question on compound action at target
remain main challenges, as shown in different industry benchmarking
analyses pointing at lack of clinical efficacy as a major reason for
program terminations. An aim has therefore been to improve qualitative
aspects of drug R&D, with a focus on the transition phase between
research and development. Consequently, various translational science
strategies have been implemented, aiming at smoothing the transition
from in vitro and animal pharmacology to human studies. A linked
approach has been to strive to achieve signal of clinical efficacy
(proof-of-concept; PoC) as early as possible. |
|||||||
| Johan Luthman, Global Head, Exploratory Medicine Neurology, MerckSerono International | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| 8:45 | Driving Global R&D Performance – Challenges & Opportunities | ||||||
|
Today’s global Pharmaceutical
R&D organizations face unprecedented technical challenges in bringing to
the market sufficient quantity of new drugs that patients will benefit
from, healthcare organizations will pay for, and stockholders will
regard as a good return on investment. Furthermore, the industry is
operating against a backdrop of low industry esteem across many
stakeholder groups. In order to meet these challenges, companies are
aggressively evolving their business models along multiple dimensions: • Organizational mix • Therapeutic Area mix • Therapeutic Modality mix • Technology mix • Internal vs. External Resource mix Which of these dimensions offers the largest potential opportunity for transformation of the pharma R&D model to deliver innovative new therapies cost-effectively? How much progress is being made in pursuit of these changes? This presentation will explore approaches taken at Pfizer to transform its R&D organization, encompassing changes in all these dimensions. It will also highlight the progress made to date in terms of hard success measures and the outlook for the future. |
|||||||
| Keith James, Ph.D., Vice President, Site Research Head, La Jolla, Pfizer, Inc. | |||||||
| 9:30 | Networking Refreshment Break & Exhibit Viewing | ||||||
| Biological Therapeutics | |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
Session I - Targeted Biologics: Antibodies & Beyond | |||||||
|
10:00 |
Harnessing New and Old Technologies to Accelerate the Discovery and Characterization of Therapeutic Antibodies | ||||||
|
Jean-Phillipe Stephan, Research Senior Scientist (Technology), Genentech, Inc. | |||||||
|
10:30 |
Selection and Conjugation of Human Antibodies for Highly Potent Therapeutics | ||||||
|
Transgenic mice expressing human immunoglobulin genes have been used to generate human antibodies to a large number of targets of potential utility in cancer therapy. Screening methodology has been devised to rapidly evaluate and select antibodies with desirable properties, tailored for different potential mechanisms of action. For example, rapidly internalizing antibodies have been identified for a number of different tumor-associated antigens and these have been shown to be capable of specifically delivering chemotherapeutic agents. Antibody-drug conjugates with DNA minor-groove binding alkylating agents are a novel class of conjugates with attractive properties for development. Anti-CD70 conjugates with promise for therapy of renal cell carcinoma as well as a number of lymphomas will be described, as well as anti-PSMA conjugates for prostate cancer, and CD19 directed conjugates for B-cell tumors. These conjugates are capable of efficient delivery of the chemotherapeutic agent with a large therapeutic window, and have the advantage of not being subject to the major mechanisms of drug resistance. |
|||||||
|
|
David King, Senior Director, Mol. Biology & Biochemistry, Medarex, Inc. | ||||||
|
11:00 |
An Antibody Target for the Treatment of B-cell Hyper-Proliferative Diseases | ||||||
|
There is a plethora of diseases that are caused by B-cell hyper-proliferation. Because of the regenerative nature of the haematopietic system obliteration of the B-cell pool to get rid of the diseased cells has not been found to be a limiting factor. However, it would be desirable if one could selectively target only the diseased B- cells or a fraction of the B-cell pool leaving the rest unharmed. This presentation will deal with a class of B-cell surface molecules and describe studies to validate these as targets for antibody based drugs for the elimination of specific types of B-cells. | |||||||
|
Partha S. Chowdhury,
Principal Scientist, Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, | |||||||
|
Session II - Immunogenicity and Humanization |
|||||||
|
11:30 |
Humanization of Antibodies via Specificity-Determining Residues Usage Resurfacing |
||||||
|
In recent years, The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have approved more than 20 antibodies for therapeutic applications in humans. This remarkable progress of the biopharmaceutical industry has been highly facilitated by antibody humanization methods. In fact, humanization methods have been diversified and the number of humanized antibodies has shown a continuous steady growth during the last decade. This talk presents a new method to humanize antibodies. The method, called Specificity-Determining Residues Usage Resurfacing (SDRR), combines three main components that differ from previous methods, including: (1) selection of residues targeted for transferring the specificity from a non-human antibody into the human framework, (2) procedure to select human framework regions and (3) method to retain, restore or increase the affinity of the humanized product. |
|||||||
|
Juan C. Almagro, Ph.D., Research Fellow, Head of the Antibody Design Group, Centocor R&D, Johnson & Johnson |
|||||||
|
12:00 |
Targeting FGF19 in Cancer | ||||||
|
The ectopic expression of fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) in the skeletal muscle of transgenic mice leads to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. While FGF19 bound only to FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4), its apparent liver specific activity could not be explained solely by the distribution of this receptor. We recently identified Klotho beta (KLB) as a novel FGFR4 co receptor required for FGF19 binding, intracellular signaling, and downstream modulation of gene expression. The tissue specific activity of FGF19 supports the unique intersection of KLB and FGFR4 distribution in liver. To investigate the utility of FGF19 as a potential cancer-therapeutic target we developed an FGF19 neutralizing antibody. This antibody abolished FGF19 binding to FGFR4, intracellular signaling, and downstream modulation of gene expression in vitro. It also inhibited in vivo FGF19-mediated modulation of gene expression, growth of tumor xenografts, and development of hepatocellular carcinomas in FGF19 transgenic mice. These studies describe the molecular mechanism responsible for the tissue-specific activity of FGF19 and suggest that inhibiting its ability to signal may be beneficial for the treatment of cancer. | |||||||
|
Luc Desnoyers, Scientist, Molecular Oncology, Genentech, Inc. | |||||||
|
12:30 |
Lunch |
||||||
|
Session III - Novel Protein & Peptide Therapeutics |
|||||||
|
2:00 |
Discovery and Development of Liraglutide, the First Once-Daily GLP-1 Analog | ||||||
|
Discovery and development of
liraglutide, the first once-daily GLP-1 analog: |
|||||||
|
Lotte Bjerre Knudsen, Senior Principal Scientist, Diabetes Biology & Pharmacology Mgt., Novo Nordisk A/S | |||||||
|
2:30 |
The Development of ZT-031: A Novel PTH Analog for the Treatment of Bone Diseases |
||||||
|
The bone formation activity of parathyroid hormone (PTH) has been established for several decades but it is only in the last five years that it has become established as an osteoporosis therapeutic. ZT-031 is a novel cyclic 31amino acid PTH analog that has also demonstrated marked bone formation activity in preclinical studies but with reduced evidence of toxicity mediated by increases in serum calcium. In a 12 month study in postmenopausal women daily subcutaneous injection of ZT-031 produced large increases in spine bone mineral density. Modest increases in serum calcium, leading in some cases to isolated episodes of hypercalcemia, were observed but the overall benefit to risk profile was considered appropriate to move forward into Phase 3 registration studies. From platform provided by this clinical database we are now exploring the use of ZT-031 in other clinical settings and as an intranasally administered peptide. This expanded program will complement our continued development of ZT-031 for the treatment of osteoporosis with the goal of expanding the range of clinical uses of PTH analogs. |
|||||||
|
Brian MacDonald, CEO, Zelos Pharmaceuticals |
|||||||
|
3:00 |
TBA |
||||||
|
|
Chris Holmes, Senior Director, Chemistry, Affymax |
||||||
|
3:30 |
New Technologies in Liquid Drug Delivery: Preservative Free Nasal and Ophthalmic Systems |
||||||
|
Another aspect covered is an overview of existing technologies available for both preserved and unpreserved ophthalmic preparations, taking advantages and constraints of recent developments into account, before taking a closer look at a new technology behind novel dispensing devices with a purely mechanical function, allowing a multidose application of unpreserved ophthalmic preparations. Matthias will show details of how ophthalmic solutions can be kept sterile during use, plus whether and how the systems are compatible with current filling technologies. |
|||||||
|
|
Matthias Birkhoff, Director, Business Development Pharma Division, Pfeiffer-Group |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
4:00 |
Networking and Refreshment Break | ||||||
|
4:30 |
| ||||||
|
6:00 |
End of Day 2 - Biological Therapeutics Track | ||||||
|
Friday, October 17, 2008 | |||||||
|
7:00 |
Registration & Breakfast | ||||||
|
8:00 |
| ||||||