|
Register
3 for the price of 2
with the coupon code
rcdvb! |
|
Clinical Sequencing Workshop - May
29th, 2012
Moderator: Gary Schroth, Senior
Director, Expression Application R&D, Illumina |
| |
|
| 12:00 |
Registration |
| | |
| 12:55 |
Welcome & Opening
Remarks |
| | |
| 1:00 |
Emerging Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies and its Clinical Applications |
| |
Thomas Scholl, Vice President, Research & Development, Integrated Genetics /
LabCorp |
| |
Next-generation sequencing is undergoing accelerating translation into the
clinical realm. Several clinical diagnostic tests are available that employ
next-generation sequencing and many companies/laboratories have announced launch
dates and development plans for additional tests. Some of these products afford
improvements on existing themes by harnessing the capacity of next-generation
sequencers to increase clinical sensitivity by analyzing disease loci more
comprehensively than previously possible. Other products exploit unique
characteristics of next-generation sequencing methods to enable entirely new
diagnostic assays. An overview of these product categories focusing upon product
profiles and technical underpinnings will be presented. |
| 1:30 |
The Implementation of Next-Generation Sequencing in a CLIA Laboratory -
Issues and Challenges |
| |
Matthew Ferber, Assistant Professor of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo
Clinic |
| |
Recently there has been much discussion regarding how “massively parallel” or
“Next Generation” DNA sequencing (NGS) will impact clinical care. While the
technology promises to reduce the cost of sequencing an entire human genome to
less than $1,000, one must question the diagnostic utility of complete genome
sequencing for routine clinical testing, given the many interpretive challenges
posed by this approach. In this presentation we will discuss the promise and
pitfalls associated with the clinical application of NGS. |
| | |
| 2:00 |
Afternoon Break |
| | |
| 2:30 |
Translation of Next-Gen Sequencing from Research Applications to a Standardized
Lab Developed Test in a CLIA Environment |
| |
Andrew Grupe,
Senior Director, Pharmacogenomics, Celera |
| |
Next generation sequencing (NGS) has transformed the research sequencing
landscape. These technologies have enabled a plethora of new discoveries by
allowing us to answer questions more cost-effectively than in past and ask
questions that were impossible to address by capillary electrophoresis
sequencing or high density chip platforms. Translating NGS applications from a
research environment to a standardized test offering in a clinical reference
laboratory presents multiple challenges. These range from identifying NGS tests
that provide clinical value beyond existing tests on traditional platforms,
increased needs for a bioinformatics infrastructure to interpret and report
results, genome sequence versioning and subscription access to permit revisiting
a prior sequence because of the identification of new indications, to
consequences of updates to the technology hardware and software as well as
reagents of the rapidly changing NGS field. Changes in the regulatory landscape
that may impact the use of these technologies are also being contemplated. This
presentation will offer a users perspective of these issues. |
| | |
| 3:00 |
Measuring and Ensuring Quality in NGS |
| |
Tina Hambuch, Scientific Liaison, Clinical and
Professional Services, Illumina |
| |
Genetic testing for
clinical applications requires many components, such as physician and patient
support, informed consent, secure data management, and many others. One of the
most critical is an understanding of the analytical quality of the data that is
being used to make clinical interpretations. As we move to an era of
genomic testing, the importance of analytical validity increases because of the
substantially increased potential for what can be learned from the same data.
Illumina Clinical Services Laboratory has been performing whole genome
sequencing in a CLIA certified, CAP accredited setting for nearly three years.
This clinical test provides a comprehensive catalogue of variation across the
genome, yielding >90% of the NCBI reportable reference genome and
representing >96% of the exome. The quality of the calls is measured and
monitored using a variety of metrics. Additionally, every genome is also
analyzed on the Human 1M duo array, which genotypes over 1 million variants
distributed across the genome, and the concordance to the sequencing results are
compared.
We have compared the sequence data from multiple genomes, so that we are able to
characterize regions and loci of particularly high quality as well as flag what
may be unreliable. The quantitative nature of Next Generation Sequencing
technologies allows us to evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity at
the single base pair level, thus we report on the quality of every base that is
called. As the scope of NGS applications expands in the clinical setting, robust
and ongoing evaluations of quality are critical to ensure that NGS will realize
its potential for improving patient care. |
| |
|
| 3:30 |
[Interactive Q&A Panel] |
| |
|
| 4:00 |
Workshop Concludes |
| | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Day 1 - Wednesday, May 30, 2012 |
| |
|
| 7:00 |
Registration |
| |
|
| 7:55 |
Welcome & Opening Remarks |
| |
|
Pharmaco-omics
Richard Head, Genomics and
Pathology Services, Washington University School of Medicine |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
KEYNOTE PRESENTATION |
|
8:00 |
Pharmacogenomics: Beyond Biomarkers |
| |
 |
Richard M. Weinshilboum, M.D.
Mary Lou and John H. Dasburg Professor in Cancer Genomics Research
Chair, Division of Clinical Pharmacology
Professor of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics and Medicine
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine |
| |
|
| |
Pharmacogenomics is the study of the role of inheritance in variation in drug
response phenotypes. Those phenotypes can vary from serious adverse drug
reactions at one end of the spectrum to lack of the desired therapeutic efficacy
at the other. Pharmacogenetics has evolved into pharmacogenomics in the present
post "Genome Project" world, with the application of techniques such as
genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) to
perform pharmacogenomic studies. There is also increasing emphasis on the
clinical translation of pharmacogenomics to the bedside but--in
addition--pharmacogenomics is also discovery science. This presentation will
focus on moving "beyond biomarkers" to place an emphasis on the use of
pharmacogenomics to pursue functional explanations for pharmacogenomic
observations as well as novel drug mechanisms. A series of examples will be used
to illustrate this approach, focusing on the endocrine therapy of breast cancer,
but the underlying principles will apply to all classes of drugs.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| 8:45 |
Moving Pharmacogenetics from the Laboratory to Clinical Practice |
| |
Tristan Sissung, P.h.D., Staff Scientist and Head of the Pharmacogenetics Core,
Clinical Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute |
| |
|
| |
The field of pharmacogenetics is rapidly
expanding although we are still in the early stages of characterizing how
genetics affects pharmacotherapy and applying this information in the clinic.
According to the FDA, there are approximately 100 drugs with pharamcogenetic
information in the label. Of these, six drugs have a boxed warning, indicating
severe adverse effects in some users. In general, genes that have
pharmacogenetic interactions fall into three major categories: (i) genes
encoding enzymes that mediate drug disposition (i.e., ADME); (ii) genes encoding
proteins that interact with drug activity; and (iii) genes encoding human
leukocyte antigens that cause immune adverse drug reactions. Most of the initial
studies in pharmacogenetics were candidate gene based; that is, these studies
were largely hypothesis driven based on an understanding of drug pathways. More
recently, pharmacogenetics findings have often been driven by larger scale
discovery-science approaches, such as genome wide SNP studies or platform-based
studies where multiple genetic factors that participate in pharmacology were
studied. As nucleotide sequencing becomes more sophisticated and less expensive,
large-scale efforts are more likely. Clinically, pharmacogenetics interactions
generally either result in increased toxicity or reduced efficacy and either
inform dose changes or choice of alternative therapy. However, in spite of
accumulating evidence, there are few examples where pharmacogenetics-based
dosing or treatment strategies are oft-used in the clinic. |
| |
|
| 9:10 |
Strengthening Genomic and Disease Inquiry with Metabolomics |
| |
Mike Milburn, CSO, Metabolon |
| |
|
| |
Genome-wide association studies
(GWAS) have identified many risk loci for complex diseases, but because of the
multiple genes involved in many diseases and/or conditions the effect size is
usually quite small. We recently published the largest human genome wide
association study analyzing over 500 metabolites for over 3000 human blood
samples (Nature, 477, pg. 37-41, 2011) and their concentration statistics
relative to genotyping data. This study reported a comprehensive analysis of
genotype-dependent metabolic phenotypes using a GWAS with non-targeted Global
metabolomics investigating over 60 metabolic pathways. We identified 37 genetic
loci associated with blood metabolite concentrations, of which 25 show effect
sizes that are unusually high for GWAS and account for 10-60% differences in
metabolite levels per allele copy. Our associations provide new functional
insights for many disease-related associations that have been reported in
previous studies, including those for cardiovascular and kidney disorders, type
2 diabetes, cancer, gout, venous thromboembolism and Crohn’s disease. This study
clearly established the penetrance of genetic individuality to the measured
metabolite levels even in blood and demonstrates the importance of strengthening
genomic and disease inquiry with metabolomics. |
| |
|
| 9:35 |
Disease
Biology-based, Post-genomic Approaches for Prognostic and
Efficacy-predictive Biomarkers for Cancer |
| |
Peter Blume-Jensen, CSO, Metamark Genetics |
| |
|
| |
The significant advances in cancer
genetics in recent years have been met with only limited successes in progress
in cancer treatment and care. To a great extent this is due to the challenges in
identifying which specific genetic mutations are ‘drivers’ of the cancer
phenotype. Metamark is taking a functional, mechanistic approach to identify the
proteins and signaling pathways that are causally involved in the aggressive,
metastatic cancer phenotype. Many of these ‘driver’ proteins are potential novel
drug targets. Our scientific approach enables development of powerful prognostic
and efficacy-predictive, protein-based, quantitative biomarkers.
|
| |
|
| 10:00 |
Morning Break |
| |
|
| 10:30 |
Multiplex MRM-MS and iMALDI-MS
for Personalized Medicine |
| |
Andrew Munk, MRM Proteomics
Inc. |
| |
|
| |
One focus of the University of
Victoria – Genome British Columbia Proteomics Centre is the development and
application of mass spectrometry (MS) based proteomics approaches towards
clinical implication. In particular, we are focused on further development and
improvement of two MS centric approaches: Multi-Reaction Monitoring (MRM) and
immuno-MALDI (iMALDI) – both have great potential for biomarker validation and
discovery and translation into clinical set ups since these approaches are
rapid, highly specific and enable absolute and multiplex protein quantitation.
We have developed a 67 protein MRM-assay for validation of numerous
cardio-vascular disease (CVD) biomarkers (up to 1 ng/ml) in human blood plasma.
We applied the MRM-assay in a medium scale project analyzing 250 blood samples
in triplicate verifying a panel of proteins that are distinguishable between
different CVDs. Furthermore, to address the clinical requirement, we have
developed highly robust, sensitive and reproducible multiplex MRM approaches
using new MS-technologies like the dual ion funnel technique from Agilent
on-line coupled with high-flow UPLC.
The iMALDI technology is a combined approach of immuno-enrichment of peptides
followed by MALDI-MS and has the capabilities to detect proteins at pg/ml
concentration. An multiplex iMALDI assay to determine the plasma renin activity
and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) by measuring the concentration of
angiotensin I & II in blood has been developed into a clinical assay for
hypertension. This iMALDI assay has great potential for personalized medicine
and will replace the currently used radio-immunoassay in a Vancouver hospital
due to its higher specificity, speed, accuracy and sensitivity at lower cost.
Benefits:
- Demonstrating the potential of MRM assays using normal LC flow rate and dual
ion funnel technologies for accurate, sensitive and highly multiplex protein
quantitation at high throughput
- New iMALDI assay for plasma renin & ACE activity being implemented in the
clinic |
| |
|
| 10:55 |
Microfluidic 3D
Culture as a Model for Personalized Therapeutics |
| |
Peter Tolias, Director, Bioinnovation Program, Stevens Institute of
Technology |
| |
|
| |
The precipitous drop in the cost
and feasibility of performing whole genome DNA sequencing is opening new
opportunities for personalized therapeutic intervention based on selection and
treatment using drug combinations defined from analysis of the whole genome of
any particular patient. This type of approach is well suited for cancer patients
where perturbations in the cancer genome can be analyzed to define the key
affected biochemical pathways and potential drug targets for which there are
available drugs for treatment. We are addressing a current gap prior to
treatment that involves experimental assessment of toxicology and efficacy of a
predicted drug cocktail for a specific patient prior to actually prescribing the
therapy. Our approach introduces in vitro assessment of the drug cocktail on a
living biological specimen obtained from the patient grown through tissue
engineering in a novel microfluidic 3D culturing platform. To this end, three
different 3D culturing devices have been designed with controllable
microenvironments that enable: (1) growth and maintenance of 3D tissues which
are better at representing human physiology compared to cells grown in standard
2D cultures; (2) emulated microvascular, microlymphatic, and microinnervation
network functions; (3) manageable microfluidic network design, control, and
stability; (4) onboard optical fiber bundle networks for microendoscopic
visualization of tissue cells and real-time microarray multiplex measurements of
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. These attributes make this novel
platform technology amenable for evaluation of drug action prior to clinical
trials, and development of new disease models for personalized medicine. |
| |
|
| 11:20 |
Accelerating Compound Specific Biomarker Research based on Multiple
Technologies |
| |
Yoshiya Oda, Biomarkers and Personalized Medicine Core Function Unit, Eisai |
| |
|
| |
Our unit mission is to utilize biomarkers to
increase the value to patients of Eisai drug candidates. We have three types of
biomarkers for drug development: 1) to achieve POM (proof-of-mechanism) for
decision making for project teams in early clinical stage and determination of
correct dosing (amount/schedule), 2) to identify most appropriate patients
(patient stratification) for enhancement of success rate of projects and
reduction of clinical study size, 3) to encourage patients/increase confidence
of projects based on efficacy biomarkers. We have responsibility about these
biomarker research, and our three main roles are 1) biomarker discovery to
identify biomarker candidates and confirm biomarker candidates in early clinical
stage, 2) biomarker assay development to increase sensitivity, selectivity and
speed of assays, and to validate assay methods, 3) preclinical and clinical
biomarker assay to provide flexible, quick and quality service to projects, and
to work as a team with project members. To achieve these tasks, we have micro
array systems for gene signatures, Taqman low density array systems and
nanoString for accurate gene quantitation, Ion Torrent for gene mutation
analysis, multiplexed ELISA systems for protein assays, mass spectrometry
systems for proteomics and metabolomics, immunohistochemistry capability and
bioinformatics to integrate those information. I will present some of our case
studies in the conference. |
| |
|
| 11:45 |
Personalized Pharmacogenetics – The Forgotten Part of Personalized Medicine |
| |
Richard Head, Genomics and Pathology Services, Washington University School of
Medicine |
| |
|
| |
The clinical utility of next
generation sequencing to guide personalized medicine is well established.
Genomic analysis (whether by whole genome, exome, or focused panels) is used to
identify sequence variants that underlie inherited constitutional diseases, as
well as acquired sequence changes responsible for oncogenesis, and therapy is
personalized based on selection of drugs known to target the identified
mutations. However, a focus on constitutional or acquired drug targets ignores
opportunities provided by genomic analysis of the loci that encode proteins
controlling drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) to
adjust drug dosing for maximum therapeutic benefit. ADME screening can be used
to identify patients with clinically significant alterations of target drug
pharmacokinetics which may be associated with toxicity or an insufficient
therapeutic effect at standard dosing levels. This presentation will explore the
significance of genomic analysis of ADME loci, which, though currently a
forgotten part of personalized medicine, will have an increasingly important
role in basic science investigations, clinical trial design, and routine patient
care. In particular, the talk with highlight the following key issues:
- What precedents demonstrate the clinical utility of personalized drug dosing?
- What genetic regions underlie ADME?
- Can next generation sequencing approaches be leveraged to address ADME issues
to provide for personalized drug dosing?
- Is it likely that the current reimbursement environment will pay for ADME
testing? |
| |
|
| 12:10 |
Lunch On Your Own |
Advances in Genomic Medicine
Moderator: Paul Billings, Chief
Medical Officer, Life Technologies |
| |
|
| 1:40 |
The
Impact of Universal Clinical Sequencing on Patient Treatment |
| |
Paul Billings, Chief Medical Officer, Life Technologies |
| |
|
| |
The development and implementation of microprocessor based next generation
sequencing methods are rapidly speeding universal sequencing in clinical
settings. The method’s simplicity, speed and accessibility are revolutionizing
cancer care, the management of unknown conditions, and the diagnosis of certain
infections. New targets are being identified, previously described disease
drivers are finding new applications, and companion diagnostic products are
being produced. This talk will review recent findings and suggest changes that
are evolving,
Those attending will benefit by understanding:
- ION Torrent sequencing
- New clinical results
- Novel applications
- Clinical issues confronting this field
|
| |
|
| 2:05 |
Integration of NGS Based Profiling into the Oncology Biomarker Identification
Pipeline |
| |
Yair Benita, Senior Computation Biologist, Merck |
| |
|
| |
Next generation sequencing (NGS) provides deep
molecular insight into tumors at a low cost. However, the major challenge of
employing this technology is the difficulty to interpret the vast amount of data
obtained from cancer genomes and transcriptomes. In an effort to identify
biomarkers of drug response we profiled hundreds of cell lines and exposed them
to various drugs and drug combinations. In this talk I will discuss the
challenges of interpreting NGS data and our current solutions for integrating
this technology into the drug and biomarker development process. I will present
our strategy to identify cancer driving somatic mutation, methods to link these
mutations to drug response data and finally methods to project cell line
profiles to tumors. |
| |
|
| 2:30 |
Integration of Profiling and NGS in Cancer Drug Discovery: Targets, Models, and
Resistance |
| |
Paul Rejto, Director and Head of Computational Biology, Oncology Research Unit,
Pfizer |
| |
|
| |
Responders to targeted therapies
are typically limited to select patient populations, motivating the need for
precision medicine approaches in the clinic. The implications of tumor
heterogeneity and differential drug response have important implications for
preclinical drug discovery that can be addressed by the growing availability of
NGS. In this presentation, practical examples where molecular characterization
has enabled and accelerated cancer drug discovery programs in a large
pharmaceutical company setting will be presented including target
identification, model selection, and predictive biomarkers for patient
segmentation. Benefits:
- An NGS exome study of human gastric tumor samples identified novel cancer
mutations and target candidates
- Molecular profiling of patient-derived xenografts and cell lines prioritized
model systems for preclinical study
- Pharmacological testing of well-characterized model systems enabled the
development of predictive biomarkers of drug response
- Resistance mechanisms have been identified by integrating profiling and NGS
approaches |
| |
|
| 2:55 |
Afternoon Break |
| |
|
| 3:20 |
Informatics Platforms for Biomarker Research in the Next-Generation
Sequencing Era |
| |
James Cai, Head, Disease & Translational Informatics, Roche |
| |
|
| |
Treating the right patient with
the right drug at the right time requires deep understanding of the disease
mechanisms at the personal level. This personalized approach has become
increasingly feasible with the rapid advances in the genomic technologies,
especially in the Next-generation sequencing technologies. As the sequencing
costs continue to drop at a rate faster than Moore’s law predicts, data
management, analysis and interpretation have become and will continue to be the
new bottleneck in the near future. How can we translate this massive amount of
data into new targets and biomarkers for personalized treatment? In this talk, I
will discuss the informatics strategies in addressing these challenges
illustrated in a specific use case in Oncology, where hundreds of cancer cell
lines have been profiled with exome-seq, RNA-seq, microarray gene expression
measurements, copy number variations and compound sensitivity assays. In
particular, audience can benefit from discussions in the following topics.
- A high-performance NGS pipeline that computes hundreds of exomes concurrently
- Validation of novel genetic variations
- A database and web application that provide integrated views of NGS and other
genomic data
- What can we learn about the genomic landscape of cancer cell lines
- Finding response or resistance biomarkers as hypotheses for patient
stratification |
| |
|
| 3:45 |
Using Systems Biology to
Accelerate Oncology Drug Development |
| |
Johanna Lahdenranta, Principal Scientist,
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals |
| |
|
| |
This session will discuss how
Merrimack uses mathematical models of cancer signaling pathways to design novel
therapeutics, identify predictive biomarkers, and guide clinical development
plans. By combining the knowledge gained from our biochemical model together
with biomarker measurements from a large panel of archived tumors and clinical
data from the literature, we simulated the effect of our lead oncology drug in a
variety of cancer indications and used these simulations to help prioritize our
clinical development plans. We will also discuss how we use our mathematical
models to assess other targeted oncology drugs and determine which of these
drugs should be combined with our therapies. |
|
Identification and Validation of Drug Targets
Moderator:
Yair Benita, Senior Computation Biologist,
Merck |
| |
|
| |
|
| 4:15 |
Systematic, Genome-Scale Identification of Novel Drug Targets |
| |
Alex Gaither,
Laboratory Head,
Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research |
| |
|
| |
The
pharmaceutical industry faces a number of continual and growing challenges in
bringing innovative new medicines to the clinic. The earliest challenge in the
drug discovery process is the identification of novel, validated targets that
have a high probability of providing both safe and effective therapeutic
strategies. To this end, the The Department of Developmental and Molecular
Pathways has focused on carrying out genome-scale gain and loss of function
screens in mammalian systems that model disease processes in vitro. A focus on
molecular pathways associated with human disease should help ensure the clinical
relevance of identified targets. Examples of target identification from genome
scale gain and loss of function screens will be presented.
Benefits of this talk:
-Description of approaches to comprehensively define regulators of human
molecular signaling pathways.
-Evaluation of the utility of large scale RNAi approaches in mammalian cells.
-Comparison of different functional genomics approaches to target discover. |
| |
|
| 4:40 |
The Next Challenge – Translating the Cancer Genome into Impactful Drugs |
| |
Markus Warmuth, President and CEO
H3 Biomedicine |
| |
|
| |
Human Cancer evolves through a
series of genetic and epigenetic events that allow a normal cell to become
transforming and spread to distant organs. The past few years have seen a
dramatic change in our understanding of the genetic basis of human cancer,
mostly driven by the advances made in next generation sequencing technologies.
Rapid and cost effective analysis of cancer genomes has started to not only
bring new therapeutic targets to the surface, but also holds great promise in
translating genetically target drugs and personalized medicines into the clinic.
However, there are still many obstacles to overcome. As cancer genomic
information increases on an exponential scale it has become clear that cancer
genomes are complex, polyclonal and heterogeneous. In many cases it will not be
possible to reduce the pathogenesis of a tumor type or subtype to a single
driver activated by hotspot mutations. Instead, recent data suggest that
mutations are scatter along genes and in pathways, posing the challenge of
finding central and druggable nodes in the system. In addition, very little
validation exists for many of the pathways emerging as frequently mutated and it
is unclear if these pathways elicit oncogene addiction to a degree described for
classical cancer genes (K-Ras, B-Raf, mutant EGFR, translocated kinases).
Therefore, despite the promise of genetically targeted drugs, robust methods and
platforms need to be established to drive validation of targets and there
translation into the clinic. |
| |
|
| 5:05 |
The Application of Genetics to Support Drug Discovery and Development- Examples
of Target Validation and Patient Stratification with a Look to the Future |
| |
Stephanie Chissoe, Director and Acting Head of Genetics, GlaxoSmithKline |
| |
|
| |
Naturally occurring human genetic
variation can provide a tool to predict drug response and understand drug target
biology. As the collective pharmaceutical industry success rate for the
development of novel medicines per investment dollar has declined over the past
decade, there has been increased focus on enhanced target selection and
validation to address failures to due lack of efficacy and on predicting drug
response via safety and efficacy pharmacogenetics. This presentation will review
recent examples of the application of genetics to support target validation and
patient stratification, highlighting the challenges facing the field and
opportunities for the future
Benifits:
- Increasing confidence in drug targets
- Integration of genetics with electronic health records
- Limitations of clinical trials
- Translation of genetics into clinical utility
- Academic-industry partnerships |
| |
|
| 5:30 |
Networking Reception |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Day 2 - Thursday, May 31, 2011 |
| |
|
| |
|
Plenary Keynote Session
Moderator:
Shidong Jia, Scientist, Oncology Biomarker Development Group, Genentech |
| |
|
| |
KEYNOTE PRESENTATION |
|
8:00 |
The Personal Genome Project - Open Access to Genome Sequences + Trait data |
| |
 |
George Church, Ph.D.
Professor, Genetics; Director, Center for Computational Genetics
Harvard Medical School |
| |
|
| |
The PGP enables open observation and critique of a large cohort "test-driving"
comprehensive participatory personalized medicine. Since 2004, we have helped
push the cost of reading and writing DNA (and biological systems) down by a
million-fold (5-fold faster exponential than Moore's law) and enabled fully
open-access human Genome+Environment=Trait (GET) data, stem cells, and clinical
community curation/interpretation tools (Evidence.PersonalGenomes.org). This
involves inherited genomes plus day-to-day genomic variation -- cancers,
microbes, allergens, vaccines, & subcellular-resolution epigenomics. We are also
sequencing centenarians and long-lived mammals. Benefits include human genome
engineering technologies for personalized diagnostics as well as stem cell,
synthetic organ, microbiome and immunome transplantation therapies.
|
| |
|
|
8:45 |
KEYNOTE PRESENTATION |
| |
RNAi and Immortality: Recognition of Self/non-Self Nucleic Acids |
| |
 |
Craig C Mello, Ph.D.
Nobel Laureate
Blais Professor in Molecular Medicine
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Howard Hughes Investigator
HHMI |
| |
|
| |
Organisms exhibit a fascinating array of gene-silencing pathways, which have
evolved, in part, to confront invasive nucleic acids such as transposons and
viruses. Not surprisingly, these pathways are highly active in the germline and
can be elicited upon the introduction of transgenes. A key question raised by
the existence of these pathways is how do they distinguish self- from non-self
nucleic acids? Evidence exists for a number of cues that might facilitate the
recognition of foreign sequences including, copy-number sensing, sensing of
unpaired DNA, or the sensing of aberrant RNA (e.g. dsRNA). Here we report on a
remarkable silencing pathway that can permanently silence even single-copy
transgenes. We show that the initiation of silencing depends on the piwi
Argonaute PRG-1 and its genomically encoded piRNA cofactors. Our findings
support a model in which PRG-1 scans for foreign sequences while two other
Argonaute pathways serve as epigenetic memories of "self" and "non-self" RNAs.
These findings suggest that organisms utilize RNAi-related mechanisms to keep
inventory of all genes expressed in the germ-line, and to recognize and silence
foreign genes.
|
| |
|
| 9:30 |
Morning Break |
| |
|
Systems Biology for Therapeutic & Diagnostic Discovery
Moderator: Heinrich Roder, CTO
and Director, Biodesix |
| |
|
| 10:15 |
Multivariate Tests for Clinical Proteomics |
| |
Heinrich Roder, CTO and Director, Biodesix |
| |
|
| |
The discovery potential of
proteomic research has opened new and exciting avenues in the understanding of
molecular pathways, and thus created the hope of the development of clinically
relevant biomarkers and eventually new clinically useful tests. New methodology
has been developed to simultaneously measure the abundance of hundreds of
proteins in simply-obtainable clinical samples like serum and plasma. Despite
the progress, there are few tests that have taken advantage of the proteomic
revolution, especially in the area of multi-variate tests that combine the
measurement of multiple proteins for purposes of prognosis and prediction.
Traditional single analyte tests are based on years of clinical discovery
focused on the role of single markers, i.e. once a given biomarker has been
established, validation reduces to the analytical problem of measuring the
marker. In contrast, in multi-variate testing the clinical validity of a test
needs to be established continuously with new clinical data. In this
presentation I will summarize the problems arising in the validation of truly
multi-variate tests, using as an example, VeriStrat®, a mass spectrometry based
test that is used in NSCLC.
Benefits:
Combination of multiple markers into a single diagnostic
Clinical validation of multi-variate tests
Practical criteria for the analytical validation of multivariate tests |
| |
|
| 10:40 |
Systems biology in cancer
immunotherapy: Applications in the understanding of mechanism of action and
therapeutic response |
| |
Debraj GuhaThakurta, Sr. Scientist II & Group Leader, Dendreon Corporation |
| |
|
| |
The talk will provide examples of the applications of high content platforms for
understanding the mechanism of action and efficacy of an approved cellular
immunotherapy, sipuleucel-T, for the treatment of asymptomatic or minimally
symptomatic metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The treatment
is designed to stimulate an immune response against prostate tumor cells
expressing the prostate antigen PAP (prostatic acid phosphatase). We are
applying high content platforms, such as protein and DNA microarrays, to study
sipuleucel-T product characteristics and immune responses. Using protein
microarrays that can assay for the presence of > 9,000 antibodies in a patient’s
serum sample, we are studying the breadth of sipuleucel-T induced immune
response, particularly that against additional tumor antigens. Results suggest
that post-treatment antibody responses are developed against genes that are
involved in cancer signaling pathways or over-expressed in prostate tumors.
Using DNA microarrays, molecular comparison of differentially expressed genes in
PBMCs indicates the activation and differentiation of APCs (antigen presenting
cells) and T-cell subsets, as well as the induction of APC and T-cell associated
cytokines in sipuleucel-T. These studies provide examples of genomic strategies
that can aid in the development, mechanistic understanding, as well as the
discovery of molecular markers associated with the efficacy of a cancer
immunotherapy. |
| |
|
| 11:05 |
Immunosignaturing as a Platform for Diagnosis and Therapeutic Lead Discovery |
| |
Stephen Johnston, Director, Center for Innovations in Medicine, Biodesign
Institute, Arizona State University |
| |
|
| |
We have developed a new platform
technology (Immunosignaturing) with applications to diagnosis, particularly
early diagnosis, and to discovery of new therapeutic targets. It is based on the
discovery that the antibody profile of a person is exquisitely sensitive to
changes in health status, and the development of a scalable method of producing
peptide arrays to read the antibody profile. The system is simple, inexpensive,
robust and comprehensive. The same chip can be used for diagnosis of any disease
in any organism. We have applied the platform to >20 different diseases and all
have distinct immunosignatures, even in pre-symptomatic stages. Historical blood
samples or samples sent through the standard mail are stable to for their
immunosignatures and less than 0.1ul is required per assay. We have recently
demonstrated that these signatures can be Deciphered to reveal proteins that are
aberrantly or mal expressed in the defective cells, even at early stages of
disease. Decipher may present a general platform for discovery of new
therapeutic leads. HealthTell, LLC in collaboration with ASU is developing these
platforms.
Benefits:
- Description of new diagnostic platform
- Method to develop diagnostics from historical blood samples
- Description of new peptide chip production technology
- Simple protocol for discovering new therapeutic targets. |
| |
|
| 11:30 |
Targeted Immuno-Affinity Proteomics: The Mass Spectrometric Immunoassay |
| |
Urban Kiernan, Senior Scientist, Thermo
Fisher Scientific |
| |
Since the conception of
proteomics some two decades ago, the field has undergone a massive evolutionary
process in terms of technologies, methodologies, and goals. This evolution has
seen a departure away from the original definition of the term and a steady
progression towards rigorous clinical application. This impetus has placed a
major focus on the coupling of high power mass spectrometry (MS) detection with
upfront immuno-affinity protein purification. This combination provides the end
user with the ability to perform enhanced multiplexed-type analyses for an added
dimension in protein analytics and improved data content. Termed the Mass
Spectrometric Immunoassay (MSIA), this natural combination of immuno-capture
with MS detection, is already gaining acceptance as a viable alternative for
clinical protein analysis as it has several assays that are now run in a CLIA
approved setting. Moreover, this next generation of high content protein data is
quickly becoming identified as clinically useful through the identification of
several novel molecular biomarkers of disease. This presentation will describe
this technical approach and provide specific examples regarding such unique high
content data as it relates to and enhances biomarker discovery, therapeutic
development, and disease state assessment.
Benefits of the Talk:
- Explain the advantages of such high content MSIA methodologies.
- Demonstrate the superior performance advantages of the described analytical
platform.
- Introduce novel protein variation in disease.
- Describe the enhancement of biomarker clinical utility by using select protein
variants of already known biomarkers. |
| |
|
| 11:55 |
Lunch Provided by GTC |
| |
|
| 1:00 |
Biomarkers: From Diagnosis to Optimal Care of LSD Patients |
| |
Kate Zhang, Director
Therapeutic Protein Research,
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company |
| |
|
| |
The desired properties of a
biomarker for lysosomal storage diseases (LSD) include specificity to the
disease, correlation with disease burden, and its ability to reflect disease
remission on therapy and conversely relapse of disease activity on sub-optimal
therapy. In addition, the biomarker should be applicable to the majority of
patients and there should be reliable assays as well as easy access to testing.
Because LSDs are multisystemic, heterogeneous and complex conditions, biomarker
discovery and subsequent assay development and validation require close
collaboration of clinical assessment and statistical and analytical analysis of
large number of patient samples. The presentation will report the LSD biomarker
discover by proteomics and lipidomics and how biomarkers are qualified in
clinical application. |
| |
|
| 1:25 |
Advanced Glycan Analysis Using HPLC-Chip/MS Technology |
| |
Rudolf Grimm, Director, Science & Technology,
Agilent Technologies |
| |
|
| |
A few years ago a fully automated and integrated
analytical system consisting of a chip-based chromatography system in
conjunction with time-of-flight, triple quadrupole and quadrupole time-of-flight
mass spectrometers was introduced. The microfluidic HPLC-chips are made of laser
ablated and laminated biocompatible polyimide films. Sample enrichment,
separation and nanoelectrospray tips are fully integrated in the chip device.
Chips with different functionality can be easily designed and developed for
specific LC/MS applications. The system represents a breakthrough in
nanoelectrospray MS sensitivity, chromatographic separation, reproducibility,
sample throughput and ease of use.
In this presentation an update about the latest technical developments of the
Chip-MS system will be provided. Applications of the Chip-MS system to the study
of all classes of glycans (free glycans, N-glycans, O-glycans and
glycosaminoglycans such as heparin) will be discussed. A new chip will be
introduced that allows the fully automated analysis of N-glycans using an
on-chip micro-reactor packed with immobilized PNGase F. |
| |
|
| 1:50 |
Protein Pathway Activation Mapping for Personalized Therapy: Applications at the
Bedside |
| |
Emanuel Petricoin, Ph.D., Professor, Co-Director,
Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason
University |
| |
|
| |
Proteomics is now entering into a
new phase in the post-genome era. Since most molecularly targeted therapeutics
target proteins, and since most clinical analytes that are used now and are in
the pipeline for use for early detection and monitoring of cancer are proteins,
proteomics is at the central nexus of molecular medicine. Cellular signaling
pathways are a protein-based network, and the intended drug effect is to disrupt
aberrant protein phosphorylation-based enzymatic activity, and epigenetic
phenomena. Pharmacoproteomics, or the tailoring of therapy based on proteomic
knowledge, will begin to take a central role in this process. A new type of
protein array platform, the reverse-phase protein microarray, has begun to show
enormous potential for providing detailed information about the state of the
cellular ‘circuitry’ from small samples such as patient biopsy specimens.
Coupled with a novel tissue fixative for molecular analysis, measurements of
hundreds of specific phosphorylated proteins that constitute a novel
patient-specific “drug target activation portrait” can be obtained at once from
only a few thousand cells. Clinical utilization of this powerful platform is
occurring at the bedside whereby key missing pieces of information concerning
the state of the activated protein “circuitry” is being exploited for
personalized therapy applications. |
| |
|
| 2:15 |
Gene Expression Markers in Blood
that Predict Alzheimer’s Disease |
| |
Eric Yang, Informatics Scientist,
Johnson & Johnson |
| |
|
| |
Even with the existence of a
disease modifying treatment for Alzheimer’s Disease, the best that we can hope
for is the halting of disease progression, and not the reversal of cognitive
impairment. Thus, it is of great interest to be able to detect Alzheimer’s
Disease early in patients who are still cognitively normal. However, for us to
accomplish this task, the test must be cheap as well as accurate. In
collaboration with Kings College London, we can demonstrate that gene expression
data obtained from a blood sample can provide signals that differentiate between
people who are cognitively normal and people who have Alzheimer’s Disease.
Furthermore, unlike prior work in blood diagnostics which required 50 or more
genes/protein markers to distinguish between these two groups, we will show that
a relatively small number of genes (11) are needed to differentiate between
these two clusters. More interestingly, we can show that the cases where
classifications by this gene expression fingerprint which do not agree with the
underlying clinical diagnosis, there is evidence that the underlying clinical
diagnosis is incorrect.
Benefits:
Identification Early Markers of Disease
Identification of Mechanisms Surrounding Disease
Review of Methodology
Overview of Biomarker state of the Art |
| |
|
| 2:40 |
Alzheimer
Disease Biomarker Discovery and Validation Strategies |
| |
Martin Latterich, Professor, Proteogenomics Research Institute for Systems
Medicine |
| |
|
| 3:05 |
Conference Concludes |
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Attend ALL 2012 GTC Conferences for only
$3995 ($1990 for acad/govt).
Click
here to sign up! |
|
|